In reading chapter 5 Identity and Intercultural
Communication in the Intercultural Communication in Contexts book I was
interested in how many actual identities are available for use to relate to that
I never thought about before. There were actually two things that caught my
attention. The first identity that
jumped out at me was class identity. Class identity, according to Martin
and Nakayama, is a sense of belonging to a group that shares similar economic,
occupational, or social status (Martin & Nakayama, 2022). In reading about
class identity, it made me realize that I tend to socialize and connect more with
individuals that are in the same economic situation as me or have a similar or
same occupation. I tend to be a little more reserved and introverted when
around individuals that are of higher-class identity. Also looking at the types
of things I prefer to do and things I grew up doing is largely different than
some of my friends and co-workers that grew up in a economic class. This also exampled
to me while I have more of a preference for sports and outdoor things rather
than going to expensive restaurants or art museums as I wasn’t exposed to that
while growing up.
The second
identity that jumped out at me was the age identity, according to Martin
and Nakayama, is the identification with the cultural conventions of how we should
act, look, and behave according to our age (Martin & Nakayama, 2022). Age was something I
knew made people different but not to this extent. I always considered age as
just that a numerical difference. Now I have a whole new perspective on what
age can mean. I never thought about age as conventions about how I should act,
look and behave. For example, in the Intercultural Communication in Contexts
book there is an example of looking at clothes and feeling too old or too young
for clothes displayed in a window or a magazine (Martin &
Nakayama, 2022).
This aspect had never occurred to me with the exception of the size of clothes.
Identifying clothes to a specific age never occurred to me as an identity that
could make up who I am as a person. In my classes I keep learning more and more
about who I actually am as a person but am also challenged by the ideas and
definitions provided in terms of intercultural communication and diversity.
References
Martin, J., & Nakayama, T. (2022). Intercultural
Communication in Contexts. New York: McGraw Hill LLC.

Comments
Post a Comment