Histories
In reading chapter four of Intercultural Communication in Contexts, my thinking was challenged in many concepts during my reading. While we all learn history throughout school and in college, I never thought about how some events in history may be portrayed based on the culture telling the story. I also never really thought about how a personal history event could play a part in an individual’s feelings about a particular aspect of history. In my reading I came across two terms that made me think about how much information we may be missing about history from stories that aren’t represented, absent history and altered history.
According
to Martin and Nakayama, absent history is any part of history that was
not recorded or that is missing
Altered
history, according to Martin and Nakayama, is history that is changed in
order to serve particular ideological goals, which results in a revised
history. This type of history makes me want to dive more into the history I
learned while in school from a different perspective. If histories are altered
to maintain a certain ideology, then I would want to look at different cultural
histories to link differences in historical events. Overall, this chapter has
made me question what I actually know about history and how much of that
knowledge is factual and how much is portrayed just to uphold a identity of our
country.
References
Martin, J., & Nakayam, T. (2022). Intercultural
Communication in Contexts. New York: McGraw Hll LLC.



Comments
Post a Comment