framework orientation
After reading chapter 3 in Intercultural
Communication in Contexts there were two concepts that jumped out at me and
made me think. The orientation presented by Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck and the orientation
presented by Hofstede have different views that made me think about different
values and aspects of culture that affect communication.
In
reading the problems identified in Hofstede’s orientation those made me think
about the dynamics of our country and I was able to relate to some of them. The
two orientations that I connected the most to were power distance and
femininity and masculinity. Power distance, according to our book, refers
to the extent to which less powerful members of institutions and organizations within
a country expect and accept the unequal distribution of power
Masculinity-femininity value
was also one that I connected with. According to Martin and Nakayama’s definition,
masculinity-femininity value refers to the degree to which gender-specific
roles are valued and the degree to which cultural groups value so-called
masculine values




Comments
Post a Comment